100 by 2020

Percentage-based water reduction goals won't cut it

Percentage-based water reduction goals won't cut it

California’s growing water scarcity problems continue to wreak havoc in the agricultural and urban sectors.  When talk moves to water conservation, the focus is predominantly on the urban sector and it is tied to percentage use reductions.  Gov. Schwarzenegger has mandated a 20% reduction in urban water used by 2020.  Mayor Villaraigosa called for a voluntary 10% reduction in Los Angeles water use this spring and summer, and Angelenos have exceeded the modest goal by nearly 3%. The prohibition on watering landscaping five days a week has been a major contributor to the nearly 13% reduction in water use.

Despite these incremental moves in the right direction to get us to live within our water supply means, nothing short of a bold goal is needed to really move California.

We need to ditch the use of percentage reductions to define conservation success and we need to move to a hard per-capita water use goal.  Currently, the average Californian uses 175 gallons per day with the average L.A. local using about 135 gallons per day.  A 20% use reduction only gets us to a per capita use of 140 gallons per day by 2020 – far above the volume of water needed to live sustainably.

Instead, the statewide per-capita goal should be 100 gallons per day of potable water use by 2020.  The target is simple for everyone to understand and it is still far above the average per-capita water use in nearly every country throughout the world.

The 100 by 2020 goal provides incentives for lawn replacement, xeriscape, waterless urinals, cisterns, and expanded water recycling. The city of L.A. Should adopt this goal in conjunction with a new water recycling goal of at least 100,000 acre feet of recycled water per year by 2020: a doubling of the current, modest goal of only 50K acre feet per year.

Keep in mind, the 100 gallons per day figure is based on potable water use, not all water used, so it still provides a tremendous incentive for rainwater capture and use, and water recycling.  This means that if integrated water management was tied to per-capita use rather than percentage reduction, the overall water use per capita (potable plus recycled plus captured rainwater) will remain similar to current use with far less environmental impact, while dramatically and quickly improving water conservation.

I urge LADWP, the Metropolitan Water District, and even the state of California to adopt this bold goal as soon as possible so we can move from small incremental water use reductions to the paradigm shift necessary to sustainably balance ecosystem protection with the agricultural, industrial and personal needs of the public.

Bookmark and Share


4 Responses

  1. […] per capita use went down to 136 gallons per day – equal to today’s average for L.A. (about 135 gallons per day, per Mark Gold.) William B. Mathews – Pioneering L.A. water supply lawyer. Image from page 121 of Nadeau's […]

  2. Recently I spent a weekend in Fresno at the Piccadilly Inn. I was shocked to get in the shower and find two (2) shower heads blasting water. I lived in LA and now live near San Francisco where we are very conservation conscious. I learned from my friend in Fresno that they have no water meters and pay a flat fee for their water. I wonder what that fee is and it obviously is no incentive to conserve. If we say that agriculture has a priority on the water they should conserve the same as the rest of us.

  3. […] a blog — Spouting Off — and his latest post calls for a statewide per-capita goal of 100 gallons per day of potable water use by 2020. Right now, the average Angeleno goes through about 135 gallons per day. Earlier: Eating local in a […]

  4. Long Beach accepts your challenge

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: