Prop. 218 Is All Wet

Prop. 218 is indirectly leading to millions of dollars in rain-related property losses.

Apartments and homes in San Pedro flooded with two feet of water. Cars on Long Beach streets nearly submerged as an urban kayaker paddles by. Residents in La Crescenta living in perpetual fear of losing everything due to debris flows as a consequence of the Station Fire. The end result of this week’s L.A. storms will be millions of dollars in property losses. 

And what is anyone doing about it? The news documents the heroic efforts of first responders to minimize impacts, but these efforts provide small-scale solutions. They don’t address the large-scale flood control infrastructure improvements needed to protect property throughout the state. Local government officials are doing what they can, but thanks to Proposition 218 their hands are tied. They can’t do much more unless two-thirds of the voters support a stormwater fee increase.

Two thirds — that’s the super-majority needed to protect life and property. There is something horribly wrong with that calculus. Ask the hundreds of people evacuated near the Station Fire or the victims of flooding in Long Beach or San Pedro. Government is there to protect life and property, except from flooding thanks to the narrow wording of 218.

So whom can we turn to for relief? The dysfunctional state legislature and the lame-duck Schwarzenegger administration? There have been multiple failed attempts over the last decade to fix 218 to cover flood control and stormwater pollution from two different legislators, one a Republican (Harman) and another a Democrat (Torlakson).

Because a constitutional amendment is needed to change 218, the legislature needs a two-thirds vote to pass the amendment and get it on the ballot. The irony is painful. A super majority of the legislature is needed to pass the amendment to allow the public to vote on exempting flood control and stormwater pollution from the super-majority requirement of 218. Surely this is a definition of insanity.

How many homes must be severely damaged before the local governments rise up and demand the right to protect the lives and property of people that live in these affected cities and counties?  Where is the outrage? The League of Cities supports 218 reform, but its leaders certainly have not made it a priority.

Mayors Villaraigosa, Foster, Newsom, Sanders, Reed, Johnson and the L.A. County Board of Supervisors need to band together and make 218 reform an urgent priority for this legislative session. They need to let the governor and legislature know in no uncertain terms that it is unacceptable for the tragic, avoidable loss of property to continue.

In this economy, the state isn’t going to provide financial support for flood control infrastructure enhancement, which includes green infrastructure like Low Impact Development, and green streets and alleys that reduce flood risks. But it can at least allow local governments to govern and provide public safety services to their own residents. Allowing democracy to work at the local level through majority-rules revenue increases isn’t too much to ask.

5 Responses

  1. Isn’t it a shame that because our local governments, in particular the city of Los Angeles, are inherently corrupt, and thwarted prop 13 by willfully encouraging DWP to overcharge it’s customers for the water service and pass the overcharge along to the City’s general, fund we had to pass Prop 218. Shame Shame Shame on the politicians for their blatant arrogance and refusal to submit to the will of the people.

    Squirm baby squirm. The public WILL hold you accountable for your continued misuse of our money.

    SEE YOU AT THE BALLOT BOX!!!!!

  2. […] different legislators, one a Republican (Harman) and another a Democrat (Torlakson). — “Prop 218 is all wet,” Mark Gold, president of Heal the Bay, Spouting Off, January 20, […]

  3. Your whole argument is bogus. None of the projects you mention have been put up to voters to vote on. Moreover, why aren’t some of the unspent proceeds from state water bonds allocated to these projects? Why should we initiate yet another bond program when prior bond monies are unspent?

  4. […] But the glow at the blog of the President of Heal the Bay was short-lived after normal rainfall yesterday once again triggered flooding, mudslides and mayhem in coastal and foothill communities. To read why, click here. […]

  5. […] Gold’s Spouting Off blog blames excessive storm damages on our inability to raise stormwater funding […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: